Logo
ShowcasePricingBlogAbout

Third Generation Studios

We convert your digital vision into reality with MVP-ready custom solutions using cutting-edge technologies.

GitHubInstagramLinkedIn

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Showcase
  • Pricing
  • Blog
  • About Us

Contact Us

  • ahenry@thirdgenerationstudios.com
  • +1 (321) 370-0836

© 2025 Third Generation Studios. All rights reserved.

Back to Blog

Material UI: The Pros and Cons of Using It in Your Web App

Adrian Henry

By Adrian Henry • January 4, 2025

Web Development
Featured image for Material UI: The Pros and Cons of Using It in Your Web App

Material UI (MUI) is one of the most popular React component libraries, providing developers with a rich set of pre-built UI components based on Google’s Material Design principles. It enables faster development, a polished design, and easy customization, making it a go-to choice for many frontend projects.

But is it the right choice for your website or web app? This article explores the benefits and drawbacks of using Material UI in modern web development.

What is Material UI?

Material UI (MUI) is a React-based UI framework that offers ready-made, customizable components following Material Design guidelines. It provides a comprehensive suite of components, styles, and utilities to help developers build responsive and visually consistent user interfaces with minimal effort.

Key features include:

  • A large collection of pre-designed components
  • Built-in theme customization and styling solutions
  • Dark mode support
  • Accessibility and responsiveness
  • Integration with CSS-in-JS solutions

Benefits of Using Material UI

Faster Development with Pre-Built Components

One of the biggest advantages of MUI is its extensive library of pre-built UI components, including buttons, modals, forms, tables, and more. These components are highly polished and follow Material Design guidelines, saving developers significant time and effort in designing and coding UI elements from scratch.

Customizable Theming

MUI provides a powerful theming system that allows developers to easily modify colors, typography, spacing, and component styles. With the ThemeProvider, projects can maintain a consistent look and feel while adapting the design to match brand identity.

Responsiveness and Accessibility

Material UI components are designed to be fully responsive, ensuring a smooth experience across different screen sizes and devices. Additionally, MUI prioritizes accessibility (a11y) by following WAI-ARIA standards, making applications more inclusive for users with disabilities.

Performance Optimizations

MUI components are optimized for performance with lazy loading and tree-shaking capabilities. This helps reduce bundle size by only importing the necessary components, improving page load speeds and efficiency.

Large Community and Ecosystem

With strong community support, extensive documentation, and a wide range of third-party extensions, MUI makes it easy for developers to find solutions, get help, and extend functionality. The active development and frequent updates ensure compatibility with modern React versions.

Dark Mode and Styling Solutions

MUI supports dark mode out of the box, making it easier to provide users with a visually appealing experience. It also offers various styling methods, including CSS-in-JS (via Emotion), styled-components, and utility classes, giving developers flexibility in how they manage styles.

Drawbacks of Using Material UI

Steeper Learning Curve

Although MUI simplifies UI development, it comes with a learning curve. Developers must understand its theming system, styling approaches, and component API, which can be overwhelming for beginners or those unfamiliar with Material Design principles.

Customization Can Be Complex

While MUI offers extensive customization options, modifying deeply nested components or overriding default styles can be challenging. Customizing styles using the sx prop, Emotion, or theme overrides requires understanding different approaches, which may add complexity to development.

Bundle Size Concerns

Despite tree-shaking optimizations, MUI can contribute to larger bundle sizes compared to lightweight UI libraries or custom-built components. If performance is a major concern, developers may need to optimize imports, use only necessary components, and consider alternatives like Tailwind CSS or Chakra UI.

Opinionated Design Language

MUI follows Google’s Material Design philosophy, which may not suit every project’s branding or design aesthetic. While customization is possible, some developers may find it difficult to deviate from Material Design’s structured look and feel.

Performance Overhead in Large Applications

In complex applications with many dynamic UI elements, MUI’s heavy reliance on inline styles and CSS-in-JS solutions can lead to runtime performance issues. This can impact rendering speed, especially in highly interactive components.

When Should You Use Material UI?

Best For:

  • Applications that require a polished, professional UI with minimal effort
  • Developers who want pre-built components that follow Material Design principles
  • Teams that need a scalable, well-documented UI library with strong community support
  • Projects that require responsive and accessible components out of the box

Not Ideal For:

  • Projects where branding requires a fully custom UI without Material Design influence
  • Lightweight applications where bundle size and performance are a top priority
  • Developers who prefer utility-first styling frameworks like Tailwind CSS
  • Highly interactive applications where CSS-in-JS may introduce performance overhead

Final Thoughts

Material UI is an excellent choice for developers who want a robust, feature-rich component library that follows Material Design principles. It accelerates development, ensures a consistent user experience, and offers deep customization options.

However, it may not be the best fit for projects that prioritize minimalistic styling, ultra-lightweight performance, or fully custom design systems. Developers should evaluate whether MUI’s design language and performance trade-offs align with their project’s needs.

For those who need a powerful UI library with great documentation, strong community support, and ready-to-use components, Material UI is a strong contender. But for highly custom UI designs or performance-focused applications, alternatives like Tailwind CSS, Chakra UI, or custom-built components may be worth considering.

Back to Blog